ANALYTICAL ACTIVITY AND DIGITAL TOOLS AS A MANDATORY COMPONENT OF THE INVESTIGATIVE METHODOLOGY FOR CRIMES COMMITTED BY ORGANISED CRIMINAL GROUPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67457/lv26.1.11Keywords:
analytical activity, IT tools, organized criminal groups, intelligence-led policing, digital forensics, OSINT, social network analysis, Big Data, investigation methodologyAbstract
This study examines the role of analytical activity and specialized IT tools in the methodology for investigating crimes committed by organized criminal groups, arguing that their integration does not represent merely a technical-methodological modernization, but a fundamental shift in the investigative paradigm – from a reactive model to a proactive, intelligence-led one. The objectives pursued include: (1) demonstrating that analytical activity and IT tools constitute a mandatory, not optional, component of forensic methodology in cases involving organized criminal groups; (2) identifying the typology of applicable IT tools (digital forensics, OSINT, social network analysis, Big Data, artificial intelligence) and the manner of their integration into the intelligence cycle; (3) analyzing the national practice of law enforcement institutions and comparative international experience.
The research findings confirm that, in over 70% of cases involving organized criminal groups investigated by the Prosecutor’s Office for Combating Organized Crime and Special Cases during 2020–2024, digital evidence played a decisive role, while the lack of an integrated analytical protocol constitutes the main cause of evidentiary failure. The theoretical and practical implications of the study concern the completion of the criminal procedural legal framework of the Republic of Moldova with explicit regulations on the use of IT tools in investigating organized criminal groups, as well as the development of national methodological protocols aligned with Europol and UNODC standards.
References
Babuta A. Big Data and Policing: An Assessment of the Evidence. RUSI Occasional Paper, 2017.
Baza de date a hotărârilor judecătorești din Republica Moldova, 2015-2025 [online], [citat la 19.02.2026]. Disponibil: https://instante.justice.md
Brayne S. Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing. American Sociological Review, 2017, vol. 82, nr. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865
Carter D. L. Scientific and Technological Advances in Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysis. In: Science-Informed Policing, 2019.
Clark R. M. Intelligence analysis: A target-centric approach. 6th ed. CQ Press, 2019.
Codul penal al Republicii Moldova nr. 985-XV din 18.04.2002. În: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 14.04.2009, nr. 72-74, art. 195.
Codul de procedură penală al Republicii Moldova nr. 122-XV din 14.03.2003. În: Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova, 07.05.2003, nr. 104-110, art. 447.
Convenția privind criminalitatea informatică (Convenția de la Budapesta). 2001 [online], [citat la 19.03.2026]. Disponibil: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/RO/legal-content/summary/convention-on-cybercrime.html
Criminal Intelligence - Manual for Analysts. Vienna: UNODC, 2011.
Directiva (UE) 2016/680 a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 27 aprilie 2016 privind protecția persoanelor fizice referitor la prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal de către autoritățile competente în scopul prevenirii, depistării, investigării sau urmăririi penale a infracțiunilor, sau al executării pedepselor și privind libera circulație a acestor date și de abrogare a Deciziei-cadru 2008/977/JAI a Consiliului [online], [citat la 15.03.2026]. Disponibil: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ro/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016L0680
European Union Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA) 2021. Hague: Europol, 2021 [online], [citat la 15.03.2026]. Disponibil: https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/socta2021_1.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(21)00125-1
Guide de l’OSCE - La Police Fondée sur le Renseignement. 2020.
Jitariuc V. Impactul și rolul activității informațional-analitice în procesul cercetării și descoperirii infracțiunilor. În: Buletinul Științific al Universității de Stat „B. P. Hasdeu” din Cahul: Științe Sociale, nr. 2(16), Cahul, 2022.
Jitariuc V., Blașcu Ol. Traficul de droguri și legalizarea veniturilor provenite din activitatea criminală: trăsături, tendințe de manifestare, prevenire și combatere. În: Legea și Viața, nr. 11-12 (371-372). Chișinău, 2022.
Morselli C. Inside criminal networks. Springer, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09526-4
Oerlemans J. J., van Toor D. A. G. Legal Aspects of the EncroChat Operation: A Human Rights Perspective. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2022, vol. 30, nr. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10037
Rapoarte de activitate a Procuraturii pentru Combaterea Criminalității Organizate și Cauze Speciale, pentru perioada de activitate 2020-2024. Chișinău, 2024 [online], [citat la 19.03.2026]. Disponibil: https://procuratura.md/pccocs/comunicate/rapoarte
Ratcliffe J. H. Intelligence-Led Policing. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717579
Robertson C. et al. Untangling SNA: the use and underuse of social network analysis among crime analysts. Police Practice and Research, 2023 [online], [citat la 15.03.2026]. Disponibil: https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/es78elne/release/1
Rowley J. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 2007, vol. 33, nr. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ion BOTNARI (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









